30% TANIEJ!

Head First Ruby on Rails. Edycja polska

Head First Ruby on Rails. Edycja polska

55.30 zł   79.00 zł

Bookmark and Share

pozycje od 1 do 25 z 100,  strona 1 z 4
  • RFC1499 - Summary of 1400-1499
  • RFC1498 - On the Naming and Binding of Network Destinations This brief paper offers a perspective on the subject of names of destinations in data communication networks. It suggests two ideas: First, it is helpful to distinguish among four different kinds of objects that may be named as the destination of a packet in a network. Second, the operating system concept of binding is a useful way to describe the relations among the four kinds of objects. This memo provides information for the Internet community. It does not specify an Internet standard.
  • RFC1497 - BOOTP Vendor Information Extensions This RFC is a slight revision and extension of RFC-1048 by Philip Prindeville, who should be credited with the original work in this memo. This memo is a status report on the vendor information extensions used in the Bootstrap Protocol (BOOTP).
  • RFC1496 - Rules for downgrading messages from X.400/88 to X.400/84 when MIME content-types are present in the messages This document describes how RFC-1328 must be modified in order to provide adequate support for the scenarios: It replaces chapter 6 of RFC-1328. The rest of RFC-1328 is NOT obsoleted. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
  • RFC1495 - Mapping between X.400 and RFC-822 Message Bodies Since the introduction of X.400(84), there has been work ongoing for defining mappings between MHS and RFC-822. The most recent work in this area is RFC-1327 [3], which focuses primarily on translation of envelope and headers. This document is complimentary to RFC-1327 as it focuses on translation of the message body. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
  • RFC1494 - Equivalences between 1988 X.400 and RFC-822 Message Bodies This document describes the content of the "IANA MHS/MIME Equivalence table", and defines the initial configuration of this table. Mappings for new MIME content-types and/or X.400 body part types should be registered with the IANA to minimize redundancy and promote interoperability. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
  • RFC1493 - Definitions of Managed Objects for Bridges This memo defines a portion of the Management Information Base (MIB) for use with network management protocols in TCP/IP based internets. In particular it defines objects for managing MAC bridges based on the IEEE 802.1D-1990 standard between Local Area Network (LAN) segments. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
  • RFC1492 - An Access Control Protocol, Sometimes Called TACACS This RFC documents the extended TACACS protocol use by the Cisco Systems terminal servers. This same protocol is used by the University of Minnesota's distributed authentication system. This memo provides information for the Internet community. It does not specify an Internet standard.
  • RFC1491 - A Survey of Advanced Usages of X.500 This document is the result of a survey asking people to detail their advanced usages of X.500. It is intended to show how various organizations are using X.500 in ways which extend the view of X.500 as a "White Pages" service. This RFC is a product of the Integrated Directory Services Working Group of the Application and User Services Areas of the IETF. This memo provides information for the Internet community. It does not specify an Internet standard.
  • RFC1490 - Multiprotocol Interconnect over Frame Relay This memo describes an encapsulation method for carrying network interconnect traffic over a Frame Relay backbone. It covers aspects of both Bridging and Routing. Additionally, it describes a simple fragmentation procedure for carrying large frames over a frame relay network with a smaller MTU. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
  • RFC1489 - Registration of a Cyrillic Character Set Though the proposed character set "koi8-r" is not currently an international standard, there is very large user community (including Relcom Net) supporting it. Factually, "koi8-r" is de-facto standard for Unix and global network applications in the former Soviet Union. This is the reason the Society of Unix User Groups (SUUG) believes "koi8-r" should be registered. This memo provides information for the Internet community. It does not specify an Internet standard.
  • RFC1488 - The X.500 String Representation of Standard Attribute Syntaxes This document defines the requirements that must be satisfied by encoding rules used to render Directory attribute syntaxes into a form suitable for use in the LDAP, then goes on to define the encoding rules for the standard set of attribute syntaxes defined in [1,2] and [3]. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
  • RFC1487 - X.500 Lightweight Directory Access Protocol The protocol described in this document is designed to provide access to the Directory while not incurring the resource requirements of the Directory Access Protocol (DAP). [STANDARDS-TRACK]
  • RFC1486 - An Experiment in Remote Printing This memo describes a technique for "remote printing" using the Internet mail infrastructure. In particular, this memo focuses on the case in which remote printers are connected to the international telephone network. This memo defines an Experimental Protocol for the Internet community. It does not specify an Internet standard.
  • RFC1485 - A String Representation of Distinguished Names (OSI-DS 23 (v5)) When a distinguished name is communicated between to users not using a directory protocol (e.g., in a mail message), there is a need to have a user-oriented string representation of distinguished name. [STANDARDS- TRACK]
  • RFC1484 - Using the OSI Directory to achieve User Friendly Naming (OSI-DS 24 (v1.2)) This proposal sets out some conventions for representing names in a friendly manner, and shows how this can be used to achieve really friendly naming. This memo defines an Experimental Protocol for the Internet community. It does not specify an Internet standard.
  • RFC1483 - Multiprotocol Encapsulation over ATM Adaptation Layer 5 This memo describes two encapsulations methods for carrying network interconnect traffic over ATM AAL5. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
  • RFC1482 - Aggregation Support in the NSFNET Policy-Based Routing Database This document describes plans for support of route aggregation, as specified in the descriptions of Classless Inter-Domain Routing (CIDR) [1] and the BGP-4 protocol [2], by the NSFNET Backbone Network Service. This memo provides information for the Internet community. It does not specify an Internet standard.
  • RFC1481 - IAB Recommendation for an Intermediate Strategy to Address the Issue of Scaling CIDR is proposed as an immediate term strategy to extend the life of the current 32 bit IP address space. This memo provides information for the Internet community. It does not specify an Internet standard.
  • RFC1480 - The US Domain This is a description of the US Top Level Domains on the Internet. This memo provides information for the Internet community. It does not specify an Internet standard.
  • RFC1479 - Inter-Domain Policy Routing Protocol Specification: Version 1 We present the set of protocols and procedures that constitute Inter- Domain Policy Routing (IDPR). [STANDARDS-TRACK]
  • RFC1478 - An Architecture for Inter-Domain Policy Routing We present an architecture for inter-domain policy routing (IDPR). [STANDARDS-TRACK]
  • RFC1477 - IDPR as a Proposed Standard This document contains a discussion of inter-domain policy routing (IDPR), including an overview of functionality and a discussion of experiments. This memo provides information for the Internet community. It does not specify an Internet standard.
  • RFC1476 - RAP: Internet Route Access Protocol This RFC describes an open distance vector routing protocol for use at all levels of the internet, from isolated LANs to the major routers of an international commercial network provider. This memo defines an Experimental Protocol for the Internet community. It does not specify an Internet standard.
  • RFC1475 - TP/IX: The Next Internet This memo presents the specification for version 7 of the Internet Protocol, as well as version 7 of the TCP and the user datagram protocol. This memo defines an Experimental Protocol for the Internet community. It does not specify an Internet standard.
pozycje od 1 do 25 z 100,  strona 1 z 4

Książki warte uwagi